Pam Geller & Robert Spencer take on CPAC's banning of conservatives

For background see: 

All Tea Party groups are NOT created equal! BEWARE!

http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/2013/03/all-tea-party-groups-are-not-created.html

First Pam Geller's article:  

Monday, March 11, 2013  ATLAS Shrugs

CPAC's Al Cardenas Lies: Meeting? What Meeting? I want that meeting! @CPACNews @AlCardenasACU @seanandfrank

Popular radio show host Sean Casey (The Morning Show with Sean and Frank) had CPAC chief Al Cardenas on his show today, and Sean asked Cardenas about my banning at CPAC (a story that has gone viral). If you recall, Al Cardenas told the Washington Post last week:

"...this year we decided not to invite Pamela Geller for comments she made at CPAC critical of our officers. In each of these cases, their ad hominem attacks denigrate the debate and distract from the real point of CPAC....."

But in his response to Sean Casey this morning, he out and out lies, contradicting his previous statement. This morning he said this:

"As I have said publicly, I plan to get together with Pam. I know she does good work on a very important topic. And I plan to meet with her and see how we can collaborate in the future."

He said this publicly? He has never contacted me, nor is there any meeting planned. What a bold-faced lie. I want that meeting! Listen here: Download CardinasOnPamSandFWCBM031113
Oh and BTW, these checks made out to ACU board member and influence peddler Grover Norquist's organization, The Islamic Institute, are not "ad hominem attacks." They are from Abdurahman Alamoudi, who is serving a 23-year prison sentence for terror-related crimes. Alamoudi was also found to be a longtime secret financial courier for Al Qaeda.

More here.http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/03/cpac-chief-al-cardenas-hits-bottom-keeps-digging-lies-to-radio-show-host-about-cpac-geller-ban.html

From Jihad Watch:
 3/12/13

CPAC's demand that Robert Spencer not speak about Muslim Brotherhood influence at CPAC when accepting the CPAC People's Choice blog award: "A huge miscalculation"

Pete Da Tech Guy has a good analysis of CPAC's demand that I not speak about Grover Norquist's and Suhail Khan's ties to Islamic supremacists when receiving the CPAC People's Choice blog award. It is important to bear in mind that this is not a dispute between John Hawkins of Right Wing News and me. John Hawkins is just an errand boy, sent by grocery clerks. He told me he was relaying the gag order at the behest of higher ups he could not name, and for whom he is now taking the fall. Clearly there are some highly-placed people at CPAC who don't want the truth to get out about how deeply the organization is compromised to Islamic supremacists.
"CPAC Update Spencer/Hawkins," by Datechguy, March 8 (thanks to iOwntheWorld):

...Looking at the two statements and counter statements there are three basic facts that are in agreement: 1. Robert Spencer is the winner of the People’s Choice award
2. John Hawkins asked (or demanded) Robert not to bring up the CPAC/Norquist/Kahn when accepting it
3. Robert Declined that demand (or request).
Where the worm turns to me is this
A: “Did John ask Robert Spencer to not bring up any issues when accepting the award on his own initiative as a favor (as he said to me) or
B: was John asked/told to give that condition to Robert (as would be consistent which what Robert said to me about “checking with his superiors”) by TeaParty.net or someone at CPAC to keep Robert from speaking?
If it’s A, then John made a well meaning but foolish mistake, if it’s B then then it’s a much more insidious because that means John went along with the idea.
I understand the argument. People much more important that Teaparty.net are out. (Chris Christie) and they need CPAC more than CPAC needs them. Either John on his own or the Tea Party.net wanted to avoid trouble.
But while I understand the argument, my reaction is still: Are you kidding me?
Robert just lost a speaking gig at the Catholic Men’s Conference (coincidentally scheduled at the same time as CPAC this year) due to outside groups putting pressure on the church. There was absolutely no chance that he was going to agree to such a thing, it would be totally inconsistent with all he’s done to agree to be silent and as he said, it would be inconsistent with his honor and honorable behavior to say he would shut up and then speak.
Regardless of A or B this was a huge miscalculation. If Robert was just allowed to say whatever he was going to say it would have been one speech at one event at CPAC and that would be it. In fact even if he did say something stronger that what TeaParty.net or CPAC wanted they could have simply have pointed to the speech and contrasted it with the move to stop him speaking in Worcester as something to their credit.
Instead keeping him from speaking simply highlights divisions and sends the wrong message and makes this a story worth covering as opposed to just another CPAC event.
Once can argue CPAC is our host and we should respect that and if this was a dinner party or a college graduation that would be an excellent point. But this is a gathering of conservatives who are defenders of the Bill of Rights. It is impossible and incredible that a conservative group should do this....

OF NOTE!

It’s not by accident that Grover Norquist, who wrote the Bush amnesty and destroyed every immigration reform ever made is in league with CPAC, ACU who is headed by Cuban born Al Cardenas, another AMNESTY pusher.

Would you like to know what  Al Cardenas, the head of the ACU (American Conservative Union) and one of the powers that be at CPAC think about the Gang of 8’s Amnesty??

Ready???

“Statement from ACU Chairman Al Cardenas on Immigration Legislation

Published: January 28, 2013
Contact: Laura Rigas, (202) 347-9388, lrigas@conservative.org

“It seems that a growing number of Democrats & Republicans in Congress have found common ground on agreed-upon principles for immigration reform.

Congratulations to both sides of the aisle in forging a responsible framework today. Difficult days lay ahead in working out specifics on the legislation itself, but the Senate is off to a good start and I encourage the House to follow suit.”[snip]






This is NOT the position of legitimate, grass roots Tea Party groups!
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Contention at CPAC 2013: The Counterjihad vs. Grover Norquist,  et. al.

[snip]Ooooh, looky here:

This page lists board of directors of the American Conservative Union, which hosts CPAC. The page isn’t easy to find, most likely because it shows both Grover Norquist and fellow mole Suhail Khan. Grover is keeping a low profile; as of this writing, I don’t see him on the speakers’ roster.

The ACU chairman is Al Cardenas,********** who has been pushing for another amnesty for illegal aliens.************* He actually expects us to believe that giving eleven million illegal aliens (including a large number of Muslim infiltrators) will “stimulate the conservative electorate.”
http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2013/03/contention-at-cpac-2013-the-counterjihad-vs-grover-norquist-brett-kimberlin-et-al-8-2596006.html

 

Do you think the GOP will stop abusing you, THIS time??

Good Republicans were upset to read today about this: 

 Obama’s Religious Freedom Appointee Involved in Muslim Event 

Calling for Limiting Freedom of Speech

[snip]America’s free-speech model is in desperate need of an update, says an American-Muslim human rights activist who recently spoke at an event linked to an Obama administration appointee.

  Dr. Qasim Rashid argued that cyber-bullying laws could be used to limit freedom of expression – such as the burning of Korans -- in war time:
“When a nation is at war, many things that might be said in times of peace are a hindrance to this effort,” Rashid said on March 19 at Howard University. “And their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight and…no court can regard them as protected by any constitutional right.”
Rashid began his remarks by personally thanking Dr. Azizah al-Hibri, appointed by President Barack Obama to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) in June 2011. Al-Hibri founded Karamah, a group devoted to the rights of Muslim women, and it was this group that invited Rashid to speak.

Many conservatives feel that Muslims, with questionable ties to radicalism/jihad, are given too much importance in the Obama Administration.   One could logically arrive at that opinion.

According to Counter Jihad report:

Dr. Azizah al-Hibri , a Lebanese-American is also the founder and executive director of KARAMAH: Muslim Women Lawyers for Human Rights. This organization is heavily funded by the El-Hibri Charitable Foundation, which was established by Al-Hibri’s brother Ibrahim, who earned a fortune from his business transactions with Saudi Arabia. Another major donor has been Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, whose $10-million-dollar check for post-9/11 disaster relief was famously rejected by then-New York City mayor Rudolph Giuliani when the prince suggested that U.S. policies in the Middle East had provoked the al Qaeda attacks.

Al-Hibri served on the advisory board of the American Muslim Council during the 1990s, a time when that organization was under the leadership of Abdurahman Alamoudi, who would later be convicted and incarcerated on terror-related charges.

 Yes,  that is the same Abdurahman Alamoudi, we told you about, who wrote checks to the right's favorite lobbyist and guru, Grover Norquist to fund his Islamic Institute.



Ancient history?  Maybe.  Fast forward to the present:

The Constitution Project  - The Liberty and Security Committee  (Does it ever get any more conservative sounding than that???) has some interesting members:

Co-Chairs:  David Keene, Former Chairman, American Conservative Union

Azizah al-Hibri - Professor Emerita, The T.C. Williams School of Law, University of Richmond; Chair, KARAMAH: Muslim Women Lawyers for Human Rights

Grover G. Norquist - President, Americans for Tax Reform, ACU member, CPAC organizer.

 What is that old biblical adage about getting the log out of your own eye before picking at the splinter in the eye of someone else?

 Republican grass roots people would do well to heed the warning!    You're being USED!  There are a few  rare 'conservative' groups that are not infiltrated, if not taken over outright by the same circle of people who run the ACU/CPAC.   The same group who wouldn't tolerate any criticism of its leaders.   I think I know what kind of 'free speech' is being planned for us!

Pam Geller, Robert Spencer, Frank Gaffney, David Horowitz, Michelle Malkin, dozens of others along with yours truly have tried for years to warn you of the corruption of Grover Norquist and the open border, radical Islam operatives he surrounds himself with.  But like battered wives, your damaged eyes just refuse to see. 

David Keene is no longer with the ACU.  He dragged it into the bowels of the left by promoting amnesty and other 'big tent' nonsense  and went on to the NRA, where Grover Norquist also sits as a board member.  How long before we lose the 2nd amendment to this cabal who wants our free speech stifled, while radical Islam and illegal aliens are celebrated, as our county becomes no longer sovereign because of amnesty and unprotected borders?

Trackback:
http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/2013/03/conservativestea-partyclean-out-your.html

http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/2013/03/all-tea-party-groups-are-not-created.html

http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/2013/03/grover-norquist-everything-that-is.html

 _______________________________

I simply do not believe the media lie that 95% of Black Americans support Barak Obama and his leftist/socialist policies.

 

 ______________________________________

A sweet innocent baby was shot between the eyes by another feral youth, 

as his mother pleaded for mercy.

You know, the kind that Al Sharpton race pimps on TV.

But where is he now????  Looking for another Tawana Brawley.  SHAME!

________________________________

The week just wasn't complete without the one and only Michael Moore chiming in!

MICHAEL MOORE: 90 PERCENT OF GUNS OWNED BY 'SCARED' WHITE PEOPLE

Yeah, you FOOL!   Whites own the most guns, but they DO NOT commit the most crimes!  IDIOT!

"In 2010, the homicide rate for black male teens was 51.7 per 100,000, more than 22 times higher than the rate for white male teens (2.4 per 100,000). Rates for other groups were 17.9 per 100,000 for Hispanic males, 11.9 per 100,000 for American Indian males, and 3.2* per 100,000 for Asian and Pacific Islander males. (Figure 3)" http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2013/01/european-murder-rates-compared-to.html

He and Al should go on the road together!
_______________________________

Now, an article you need to read, in it's entirety!

 THE UNINVITED

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/03/19/Rosemary-Jenks-at-The-Uninvited-Amnesty-Would-Cost-U-S-2-5-Trillion-Give-Terrorists-Brand-New-Identities

At Breitbart News' "The Uninvited" Panel during CPAC last weekend, Rosemary Jenks, the director of government relations for Numbers USA, told the packed audience that Republicans have not thoroughly considered and discussed how giving amnesty to 11-12 million illegal immigrants would allow terrorists to receive brand new identities, cost the government $2.5 trillion dollars over their lifetime, and create more Democrats.
"The Uninvited" panel, in the spirit of the late Andrew Breitbart, ensured CPAC would have more--not less--voices, and Jenks offered up some truths that even Republicans want to conveniently ignore in their quest for "comprehensive immigration reform" that they think will magically convert Hispanics into Republicans.
Jenks told Breitbart News that the "divide between the opinions of the elite and those of the public are nowhere more divergent than on the issue of immigration, and the elites are well aware of this."
"It is this understanding that forces bipartisan groups of elites--in the current case including both the Senate Gang of Eight and the House Gang of Eight--to negotiate 'comprehensive immigration reform,' or amnesty, in secret behind closed doors, in the hopes that they can ram it through Congress before the American people know what's happening," Jenks said.
Jenks said even some of the organizers of CPAC are among the elites who attempted to "restrict any discussion of immigration to a single one-sided panel of elite amnesty supporters" with hopes that "grassroots conservatives would go along quietly and not challenge the elites' views."
She said Breitbart News realized that "grassroots conservatives are rational, thinking people who deserve to hear both sides of issues that will affect every aspect of their lives and the future of our country."
"The Uninvited Panel offered common-sense viewpoints that resonate with regular Americans, much to the dismay of the elites," Jenks said.
On "The Uninvited" panel, Jenks said President Barack Obama's immigration plan is just a "slightly more liberal twin" to the bipartisan immigration framework supported by Republican senators like John McCain (AZ), Lindsey Graham (SC), and Marco Rubio (FL). That framework, supported by the so-called "Gang of Eight," would give legal status to illegal immigrants currently residing in the country.
Jenks said that Washington is run by special interests groups, and this is especially true when it comes to immigration.
"Big business interests seeking cheap labor and religious leaders seeking to fill the pews dominate the issue from the right, while ethnic advocacy groups seeking political clout, unions seeking more dues-paying members, and immigration lawyers seeking profits dominate from the left," Jenks told Breitbart News. "Add to that misguided Republicans seeking a way to garner Hispanic votes and Democrats knowing full well that immigrants will vote overwhelmingly Democrat, and you have a situation where the only people not represented are the American people."
Most importantly, she noted during her CPAC remarks that illegal immigrants who overstayed their visas were involved in acts of terror, such as the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and the Brooklyn subway bomb plot. She said one terrorist applied for amnesty in 1986 after overstaying his tourist visa, and then promptly used his newfound green card to go to Afghanistan and get terrorist training.
Jenks, on the panel, said the current comprehensive immigration proposals do not have "have any means from preventing terrorists from getting amnesty" or "tracking people who overstay their visas." As a result, she said the amnesty programs would essentially allow the United States government to potentially issue terrorists "an official brand new identity" because there is no process in place to check the validity of the identity illegal immigrants claim when getting official papers that confer legal status.
Jenks cited a Heritage Foundation study that found illegal immigrants cost the economy $55 billion a year in services. If these immigrants get amnesty, they will qualify legally for more services, costing taxpayers $75 billion a year. In addition, the lifetime cost of giving 11-12 million illegal immigrants amnesty would be $2.5 trillion, she said.
Lastly, Jenks noted that amnesty would just create more Democrats.
"Passing amnesty is not going to get Hispanics to vote Republican," Jenks said, noting it would just increase the electoral advantage of Democrats, because illegal immigrants want more government services and favor liberal policies.
Jenks called for a mandatory e-verify system, entry and exit points at all ports, and an enforceable guest worker program only for agriculture after the ports were secured.
She said it is bogus that politicians claim immigrants need to be imported for non-agriculture jobs Americans supposedly "will not do" and said that America should "not be importing a peasant class" to do labor Americans have always done.
"It is not in our national interest to import poverty," Jenks said, noting that legal immigration should also be reformed with a focus on the nuclear family, immigrants who bring skills that the country needs for its economy and America's fair share of immigrants seeking asylum or that Americans want to take in for humanitarian reasons.


Must read Grover Norquist article: 

Investigating the intersection of politics, lobbying and public policy.

Norquist Says He Fights for 'Taxpayers,' but Goes to Bat for Donors

(donors like Microsoft & GE who want AMNESTY!)

http://www.thenation.com/blog/171600/norquists-says-he-fights-taxpayers-goes-bat-donors#

Let’s Not Discuss Immigration Reform

This is a great piece by our friend JackelopeBreeder who lives on the border and lives the nightmare of the invasion every day.
_____________

Published: Oct 27, 2005
Author: JackelopeBreeder
Post Date: 2005-10-27 23:41:06 by JackelopeBreeder
Ping List: *Immigration Issues Ping List*
29 Comments

The current usage of the phrase “immigation reform” easily qualifies as one of the most savagely twisted examples of semantics in current politics. Absolutely none of the proposals I have read to date has anything to do with immigration.

Nowhere in all the rhetoric and sophomoric sound bites is there a single reference to that forgotten group – legal immigrants. Remember them? They’re the honest people who are trying to reach this country using the legally prescribed channels. They spend thousands of dollars in fees, submit reams of paperwork, undergo thorough background and health checks – and wait for years while the bureaucracy shambles along and randomly loses key documents. It’s a miracle we have any legal immigration at all.

Has anyone reading this screed seen any proposals to fix legal immigration? If so, I really want to hear about it. Our government can’t even begin to handle the 500,000 still legally waiting offshore at any one moment in a timely fashion. Our politicians must be living in a drug-addled alternate reality if they think the government can even begin to handle the 10 to 12 million illegal aliens estimated to be working here. Toss in their families and we could easily be talking about 30 million “guests”.

First, stop and think of the sheer size of the bureaucracy needed to administer a guest worker program of that magnitude. You would needs tens of thousands of new government workers: clerks, investigators, adjudicators, etc. One of the first things to happen would be diversion of a very large chunk of the legal immigration workforce at Citizenship and Immigration Services to handle the illegal alien hordes. Legal immigration would slow to a virtual halt; is that fair to those who have been trying to get here legally? Does this constitute “immigration reform”?

It is about amnesty, even if few of our politicians have the spine to admit it. Most politicians would have to put on a double pair of Depends undergarments before uttering the word. Unfortunately, amnesty is a constant aspect of the game on our southern border.

When an illegal alien is caught crossing the first time, it’s a misdemeanor. If they’re Mexican, they are offered voluntary deportation in lieu of charges – a form of amnesty – and returned home. The Border Patrol sees a lot of repeat clientele; under Federal law, each repeat offense is a felony. Still, they are “amnestied” back across the border, sometimes dozens of times. Do we let all the felony counts slide?

Let’s look at the colorful life of an illegal alien and the list of legal issues that make their existence here possible: document fraud, forgery, identity fraud, identity theft, working illegally, tax evasion, tax fraud, fraudulent use of government benefits, etcetera ad nauseum and most are considered felonies. Do we amnesty all of these activities as well?

If an American citizen gets caught at any of these pursuits they end up as a Guest Worker – as a Guest of the State – and amnesties are few and far between for them.

The government owes the rest of us the assurance that any guest worker meets the same background checks as anyone trying to legally immigrate. They at least owe us something better than the existing system that renewed several 9/11 hijackers’ visas six months after they died whacking the World Trade Center and killing a few thousand people.

Most illegal aliens have totally inadequate personal documentation. Many have fraudulent documentation, often in a variety of names. We really don’t know who they are and have little chance of adequately checking their backgrounds in their home countries or here. And remember, their home country really doesn’t want them back, especially if they have a troublesome past.

From a taxpayer viewpoint, just looking at the size of the required bureaucracy for screening illegal aliens to become guest workers, all the cheapness in cheap labor went right out the window. Tax collections go up to pay for it, or tax revenues are diverted away from programs for American citizens.

Now let’s look at the side of “immigration reform” that our leaders constantly promise, but haven’t delivered since the days of Dwight Eisenhower: enforcement. Every “immigration reform” measure since that time consisted of an amnesty and a promise of future enforcement. We certainly got the amnesties, but apparently the future that contains the enforcement has not arrived yet.

So, if it ain’t “immigration reform”, just what is all this bizarre yammering from the District of Corruption?

Well, part of it is economic reform for Mexico. Until recently, their oil revenues were at Number One on the official revenue list. Mexico’s oil revenues for 2004 amounted to $24 billion; remittances from its erstwhile citizens here in El Norte almost matched that. Add in the $8 billion generated by trafficking in aliens and oil comes in second. (Those who dabble in diplomacy advise me not to mention this, but aliens and oil are at a very distant second and third place disadvantage when compared to Mexico’s illicit narcotics revenues. Mentioning this rude fact in polite company is the same level of social and diplomatic faux pas as openly remarking on the Queen of England’s buns.)

Another part is political reform, again for the advantage of Mexico. The best one can say for Mexico’s government is that it has been totally ineffectual since its independence from Spain. Then again, it was worse before that. Now, however, they have the advantage of being able to ship the discontented, the indigent and uneducated off to El Norte, thus delaying any serious reforms in that benighted country – and our government lets them.

The last part is labor reform pure and simple, but this time on behalf of certain industries in the United States that have become addicted to cheap labor. The more cunning amongst this crowd do not want to see any reforms whatsoever. Why?

Hector, the legal guest worker would have the same protections as an American employee: prevailing wages, Workers Compensation, Social Security, and all those other expenses the employer is trying to avoid. Remember, it’s all about privatizing profits and socializing costs. If Hector costs as much as a gringo, then he’s no longer cheap labor. But hey, there’s always Carlos, the next illegal alien over the fence, to replace him in the under-the-table wage group. Besides, if our previous history of non-enforcement is any indication, our unscrupulous employers can expect a visit from unicorns long before they see a visit from Immigrations and Customs Enforcement.

Do you want a peek at the real dirty little secret of “immigration reform”? Just look closely at the AgJobs bill championed by Congressman Chris Cannon of Utah. Hidden away in the details (and truly the Devil is in the details) is language giving amnesty and official forgiveness to any employer who ever transgressed against hiring illegal aliens. I’m willing to bet the entire bankroll that similar language gets weaseled into any new version of “immigration reform”.

So, if this really isn’t immigration reform, let’s not waste legislative time discussing it. Let’s talk about enforcement instead. Once the government proves the long term ability and will for real enforcement – from the border to the boardroom – maybe we can take another look at some sort of guest worker program in a few years. We’ve seen enough amnesties; now it’s enforcement’s turn. We don’t need new laws for enforcement; we have plenty that have just never been used. We just need the resources to make the system work – and an absence of political interference.

A parting shot at the Cheap Labor Lobby: It’s almost Halloween; a lot of us would like to see some of you wearing orange in honor of the occasion.

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=114791&Disp=29#C29

Trump: 2nd amendment and no win situations with the Media

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 1h1 hour ago Manhattan, NY
"This is the first time in my life that I have caused controversy by NOT saying something."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Following is A MUST read with all the dirty GOP players!  Reads like they've been reading TTC!

Trump Refers To GOP Candidates Who ‘Begged For Money’ From Koch Brothers As ‘Puppets’   http://exposingmodernmugwumps.com/2015/08/11/trump-refers-to-gop-candidates-who-begged-for-money-from-koch-brothers-as-puppets/
 Trump is absolutely right about the candidates asking for money from the Koch brothers, founders of Americans for Prosperity.  Here’s what I’ve found out about them and exposed:

The Koch Brothers

David and Charles Koch

The Koch brothers (pronounced “Coke”) — David and Charles — are the right-wing billionaire co-owners of Koch Industries. As two of the richest people in the world, they are key funders of the right-wing infrastructure, including the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and the State Policy Network (SPN), which are mini-Heritages in each state. Key articles on the Kochs include: Koch Brothers, Koch Industries, Americans for Prosperity, and Freedom Partners (who funds the neo-con Trotskyite Tea Party Patriots who are pushing a Constitutional Convention).    [snip]

Trump released his position paper on the 2nd amendment yesterday, and it is included in full!  GREAT read!  Where are ALL the other candidates with DETAILS...NO WHERE!! THis is Trump's second position paper!  

PROTECTING OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

Donald J. Trump on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms 
 https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/second-amendment-rights
The Second Amendment to our Constitution is clear. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed upon. Period.

The Second Amendment guarantees a fundamental right that belongs to all law-abiding Americans. The Constitution doesn’t create that right – it ensures that the government can’t take it away. Our Founding Fathers knew, and our Supreme Court has upheld, that the Second Amendment’s purpose is to guarantee our right to defend ourselves and our families. This is about self-defense, plain and simple.

It’s been said that the Second Amendment is America’s first freedom. That’s because the Right to Keep and Bear Arms protects all our other rights. We are the only country in the world that has a Second Amendment. Protecting that freedom is imperative. Here’s how we will do that:

Enforce The Laws On The Books

We need to get serious about prosecuting violent criminals. The Obama administration’s record on that is abysmal. Violent crime in cities like Baltimore, Chicago and many others is out of control. Drug dealers and gang members are given a slap on the wrist and turned loose on the street. This needs to stop.

Several years ago there was a tremendous program in Richmond, Virginia called Project Exile. It said that if a violent felon uses a gun to commit a crime, you will be prosecuted in federal court and go to prison for five years – no parole or early release. Obama’s former Attorney General, Eric Holder, called that a “cookie cutter” program. That’s ridiculous. I call that program a success. Murders committed with guns in Richmond decreased by over 60% when Project Exile was in place – in the first two years of the program alone, 350 armed felons were taken off the street.

Why does that matter to law-abiding gun owners? Because they’re the ones who anti-gun politicians and the media blame when criminals misuse guns. We need to bring back and expand programs like Project Exile and get gang members and drug dealers off the street. When we do, crime will go down and our cities and communities will be safer places to live.

Here’s another important way to fight crime – empower law-abiding gun owners to defend themselves. Law enforcement is great, they do a tremendous job, but they can’t be everywhere all of the time. Our personal protection is ultimately up to us. That’s why I’m a gun owner, that’s why I have a concealed carry permit, and that’s why tens of millions of Americans have concealed carry permits as well. It’s just common sense. To make America great again, we’re going to go after criminals and put the law back on the side of the law-abiding.

Fix Our Broken Mental Health System

Let’s be clear about this. Our mental health system is broken. It needs to be fixed. Too many politicians have ignored this problem for too long.

All of the tragic mass murders that occurred in the past several years have something in common – there were red flags that were ignored. We can’t allow that to continue. We need to expand treatment programs, because most people with mental health problems aren’t violent, they just need help. But for those who are violent, a danger to themselves or others, we need to get them off the street before they can terrorize our communities. This is just common sense.

And why does this matter to law-abiding gun owners? Once again, because they get blamed by anti-gun politicians, gun control groups and the media for the acts of deranged madmen. When one of these tragedies occurs, we can count on two things: one, that opponents of gun rights will immediately exploit it to push their political agenda; and two, that none of their so-called “solutions” would have prevented the tragedy in the first place. They’ve even admitted it.

We need real solutions to address real problems. Not grandstanding or political agendas.

Defend The Rights of Law-Abiding Gun Owners

GUN AND MAGAZINE BANS. Gun and magazine bans are a total failure. That’s been proven every time it’s been tried. Opponents of gun rights try to come up with scary sounding phrases like “assault weapons”, “military-style weapons” and “high capacity magazines” to confuse people. What they’re really talking about are popular semi-automatic rifles and standard magazines that are owned by tens of millions of Americans. Law-abiding people should be allowed to own the firearm of their choice. The government has no business dictating what types of firearms good, honest people are allowed to own.

BACKGROUND CHECKS. There has been a national background check system in place since 1998. Every time a person buys a gun from a federally licensed gun dealer – which is the overwhelming majority of all gun purchases – they go through a federal background check. Study after study has shown that very few criminals are stupid enough to try and pass a background check – they get their guns from friends/family members or by stealing them. So the overwhelming majority of people who go through background checks are law-abiding gun owners. When the system was created, gun owners were promised that it would be instant, accurate and fair. Unfortunately, that isn’t the case today. Too many states are failing to put criminal and mental health records into the system – and it should go without saying that a system’s only going to be as effective as the records that are put into it. What we need to do is fix the system we have and make it work as intended. What we don’t need to do is expand a broken system.

NATIONAL RIGHT TO CARRY. The right of self-defense doesn’t stop at the end of your driveway. That’s why I have a concealed carry permit and why tens of millions of Americans do too. That permit should be valid in all 50 states. A driver’s license works in every state, so it’s common sense that a concealed carry permit should work in every state. If we can do that for driving – which is a privilege, not a right – then surely we can do that for concealed carry, which is a right, not a privilege.

MILITARY BASES AND RECRUITING CENTERS. Banning our military from carrying firearms on bases and at recruiting centers is ridiculous. We train our military how to safely and responsibly use firearms, but our current policies leave them defenseless. To make America great again, we need a strong military. To have a strong military, we need to allow them to defend themselves.

ALSO!!! Mr. Trump, So far, has refused to sign Grover Norquist's blood oath and become owned by him!    THE best thing that could happen to this country and the GOP, is if Trump stays as far away as he can from Grover Norquist and his 'pledge'. At the base of every enemy Trump has, The ACU, Club For Growth, etc. is Grover Norquist, Mr. married to Islam, open border Lobbyist..he doesn't care about YOUR taxes, he works for Bill Gates & GE! And conservatives, SOME of your rich idols get out of paying any taxes, and that needs to STOP!

Headline: 

Grover Norquist’s surprising nemesis: How Donald Trump could break the anti-tax crusader’s stranglehold on the GOP

http://www.salon.com/2015/09/01/grover_norquists_surprising_nemesis_how_donald_trump_could_break_the_anti_tax_crusaders_stranglehold_on_the_gop/

Elections for dummies....Never vote for a Lawyer!

Those who would saddle us with a lawyer like Cruz, Rubio or Hillary for president love to throw out the old canard about the Donald Trump business empire giving money to charities, including the Clinton Foundation/Initiative.

Well, he was in good company.....these ‘good’ Republicans also gave $$ or their time to promote the Clinton Foundation/initiative.

Newsmax Media, Inc. The media company, which has billed itself as operating the “#1 Conservative Site in the Nation,”

Richard M. Scaife.

News Corporation Foundation

James R. Murdoch. Murdoch, the co-chief operating officer of Fox News parent company 21st Century Fox and son of Rupert Murdoch,

Many Republican Party-affiliated individuals have attended and supported Clinton Foundation-affiliated events, including the annual Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) meetings. They include:

Former first lady Laura Bush, Fox News founder Rupert Murdoch, former GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney, Sen. John McCain, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina, Republican billionaire T. Boone Pickens, former Secretary of State Colin Powell, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former Bush Treasury secretary Hank Paulson, and former first daughter Barbara Bush.

Romney spoke to CGI in the middle of his 2012 presidential campaign and praised President Clinton for having “devoted himself to lifting the downtrodden around the world. One of the best things that can happen to any cause, to any people, is to have Bill Clinton as its advocate.”
McCain spoke to CGI in September 2008 during his own presidential run, and also praised its efforts, stating: “You know something about great change at the Clinton Global Initiative, because you are striving every day to bring it about. I thank each one of you for the good work you have done to relieve suffering across the earth, and to spread hope. I thank you for the even greater works that you seek to accomplish in the years to come, under the leadership of the man from Hope.”
Laura Bush appeared at CGI in 2006 and said she was “delighted to be a part of this year’s Clinton Global Initiative. Thank you for inviting me, and thank you for the terrific development work you’re doing through your foundation.”

_________________________

Lawyers and Liars...but then I repeat myself!

Marco Rubio is BAD with money! His net worth is less than mine and I never earned a tenth of the $$ he has!
Forbes’ 2016 Presidential Candidate Wealth List
Net worth      Rubio $100,000
Florida senator has a house, boat, kids’ college plans and lots of debt
UP FOR SALE!!
__________________________
I know it sounds simplistic, but if you practice only one rule in voting, let it be, NEVER vote for a lawyer! The following article excerpts explain it well.



The large number of lawyers in Congress and the government was not a problem until their nature changed in the1960.s
With the large number of lawyers descending on Washington in the 1970's to enforce newly passed civil rights laws in an increasingly liberal culture, the goal of lawyers changed from doing good to simply increasing their power and influence. And in a very short time their income too.

The biggest problem with the large number of lawyers in elective office today is that, disregarding everything else, they increasingly control all branches of our government: The Legislative, the Executive and the Judiciary. This in contravention of what the founders of our nation were trying to avoid when they divided our government into three branches so as to provide “checks and balances” and a “separation of powers”.

Though James Madison author of the U. S. Constitution realized that this checking of each branch on the other made for a far less efficient government, he realized, as he wrote in Federalist 47, that the sacrifice was worth it to prevent tyranny by a government “in the same hands”:

“ No political truth is certainly of greater intrinsic value or is stamped with the authority of more enlightened patrons of liberty than that . . . the accumulation of all powers legislative, executive and judiciary in the same hands, whether of one, a few or many, and whether hereditary, self appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”

Today 46% of our government branches are in the same hands of lawyers. Who, although as lawyers constitute a very sizeable number, still make up only ½% of our population.

Lawyers make up 38% of our Legislative branch, 100% of our Judicial branch and 0% of our Executive Branch. Electing Barock Obama with his lawyer wife will cause our three branches of government to be made up 80% of lawyers. Irrespective of one's political party this is untenable if one wishes to prevent government "in the same hands". The same hands of lawyers.

Voters should not forget the decline in morality and the ignoring of terrorism during the administration of lawyer Clinton, lawyer Gore, and lawyer Hillary. It should give them pause.[snip]
__________________________________

The State of Franklin?   Most have never heard of it.  I had not until while doing some genealogy, I came upon two documents of ancestors stating they were born in 'the State of Franklin'.    And it very nearly happened, they even had their own constitution drawn up and ready to go
that disallowed lawyers, doctors and preachers from election to the legislature.  

Each cycle, contributions from this group of Lawyers favor Democrats by a significant margin. In the 2014 election cycle, the industry contributed over $120 million to federal political candidates and interests, 70 percent of which went to Democrats.  https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/recips.php?cycle=2016&ind=K01

Clinton, Hillary (D) $7,101,091   WHAT can I say??
Bush, Jeb (R)  $1,311,555.....go Jeb! LOL
Harris, Kamala D (D-CA)   $739,088
Schumer, Charles E (D-NY)  $734,322
Cruz, Ted (R)   $644,659   GOVERMENT LAWYER, that's all he's ever been.
Rubio, Marco (R)     $576,185   At least he's not running for his senate job again!

METHODOLOGY: The numbers on this page are based on contributions from PACs and individuals giving $200 or more.
All donations took place during the 2015-2016 election cycle and were released by the Federal Election Commission on Friday, October 16, 2015.
Feel free to distribute or cite this material, but please credit the Center for Responsive Politics. For permission to reprint for commercial uses, such as textbooks, contact the Center: info@crp.org


Luke 11:52  Lawyers
Woe to you, lawyers! for you have taken away the key of knowledge: you entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in you hindered.
______________________

Speaking of Charities!! BE CAREFUL who you support! 

Obama 'cried' at the thought of 'saving just one child' by pushing executive orders that will do NOTHING about mass shootings, but totally ignores enforcing immigration law (many of those mass killings were by immigrants!) which could have save THOUSANDS OF LIVES!   http://www.theremembranceproject.org/

You need to know WHO you are giving to...most are SCAMS! Many keep 90% and more of your contributions. THIS is a racket!
8. National Veterans Service Fund
7. International Union of Police Associations, AFL-CIO
6. Breast Cancer Relief Foundation
5. Firefighters Charitable Foundation 9raised $64 million in donations and paid $55 million of that to its solicitors. The charity spent less than 10 cents of every dollar raised on direct financial assistance to those in need.)
4. American Breast Cancer Foundation
3. Children’s Wish Foundation International (HOW SAD!)
2. Cancer Fund of America
1. Kids Wish Network
http://tothedeathmedia.com/the-8-most-corrupt-charities-in-the-united-states/

JOBS?? We don't need no steenkin' Jobs!

A Russian arrives in New York City as a new immigrant to the United States. He stops the first person he sees walking down the street and says, "Thank you Mr. American for letting me into this country, giving me housing, food stamps, free medical care, and a free education!" The passerby says, "You are wrong, I am from Mexico."

The man goes on and encounters another passerby. "Thank you for having such a beautiful country here in America."

The person says, "I not American, I Vietnamese."

The new arrival walks farther, and the next person he sees he stops, shakes his hand, and says, "Thank you for wonderful America !" That person puts up his hand and says, "I am from Middle East. I am NOT American." He finally sees a nice lady and asks, "Are you an American?" She says, "No, I am from Africa."

Puzzled, he asks her, "Where are all the Americans?"

The lady checks her watch and says, "Probably at work."

(contributed by rightinthemiddle )




TRACKBACK to the primaries! We let the media elect our candidates!

YOUR media is ignoring the invasion of the USA. DEMAND they report the news!

Waves of illegal aliens are flowing across the southern border into Hidalgo County, Texas, according to reports.

Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin has been reporting from the small city of La Joya, where a steady stream of illegals are strolling in and surrendering to border agents following a “recent lull.”

Only your patronage to our store is what keeps this beacon of truth lit in the controlled-narrative darkness.

“Hundreds of migrants are crossing illegally into La Joya, TX right now,” Melugin wrote on Tuesday. “Huge groups, more coming down the road as far as the eye can see. Mixture of families and runners. Families turning themselves in, group of about 30 runners caught down the road who evaded.”

More migrants arriving. @FoxNews pic.twitter.com/GVt5WZC8AM

— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) November 16, 2021

Melugin reported similar news from the area on previous days, noting that some groups are comprised of up to 300 illegal aliens.

“Good morning from La Joya, TX, where once again, 100+ migrants have already crossed illegally in this spot this morning and more are coming. Lots of teens and children in this group,” he said on Monday.

Mobs of Illegals as “Far as the Eye Can See” Pour Into Texas City (freerepublic.com)

MORE... call your local media affiliate and demand that they report the invasion of the United States!!!

• llegal Immigrants Would Get $10.5 Billion From Reconciliation Bill

  11/16/2021, 12:42:34 PM · by mikelets456 · 9 replies

  RCP ^ | 11/16/2021 | RCP

  The budget reconciliation package pushed by Democrats creates a new expanded child tax credit (CTC) that would pay illegal immigrants some $10.5 billion next year. All immigrants with children are eligible, regardless of how they got here and whether their children are U.S.-born. This includes the roughly 600,000 unaccompanied minors and persons in family units stopped at the border in FY2021 and released into the country pending a hearing. Cash welfare to illegal immigrants is not just costly; it also encourages more illegal immigration. Although it is referred to as a “refundable credit,” the new CTC, like the old additional...

• DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas Confirms Illegal Immigrants Can Sign Up for Taxpayer Funded Payments

  11/16/2021, 11:01:25 AM · by SeekAndFind · 23 replies

  Townhall ^ | 11/16/2021 | Katie Pavlich

  Testifying in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday morning, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas confirmed the Biden Administration is encouraging illegal immigrant families "separated from their children" to sign up for taxpayer funded relief checks. "We recently launched a website where families who were indeed separated can register for relief. We are working very closely with counsel for the families. We are working with the government, the nation's of origin to accelerate the provision of passports for parents who do indeed want to come here," Mayorkas said. It’s outrageous to offer massive, taxpayer funded financial payments to...

• Texas lawmaker uncovers secret operation to move migrants across the US, house them in abandoned hotels

  11/15/2021, 11:42:23 AM · by george76 · 40 replies

  Fox News ^ | 11/15/2021 | Nikolas Lanum |

  The migrants were reportedly given packets on how to get past TSA and enroll kids in schools.. Rep. Lance Gooden, R-Texas, said Monday that he has uncovered a secret operation by nonprofits to house and move migrants within the United States, providing them with a packet on how to navigate and assimilate into the country. During an appearance on "Fox & Friends" Monday, Gooden said that he was contacted by a whistleblower from San Diego who provided him with details on the kind of information the nonprofit groups were providing to the migrants. The Texas representative subsequently hopped on a...

• The collusive lawsuit between the ACLU and the Biden administration for immigration reparations is an illegal and unethical sham

  11/13/2021, 2:31:09 PM · by T Ruth · 9 replies

  the Aspen beat ^ | November 11, 2021 | Glenn K. Beaton

  The ACLU sued the United States for money on behalf of illegal immigrants for being separated from their children when they were caught and detained at the border. The Wall Street Journal reported a few weeks ago that the Department of Justice was considering settling the case for about $450,000 per individual – a settlement amounting to over a million dollars in the case of a family of three and over two million for a family of five. The basis for the ACLU’s lawsuit on behalf of the immigrants is not clear. Most legal experts agree that whatever the morality...

• A Second Major Migrant Caravan of 10K Could Head Toward the U.S. as Leaders Meet in Mexico

  11/13/2021, 1:25:37 AM · by blueplum · 2 replies

  Newsweek ^ | 12 November 2021 | ALEX J. ROUHANDEH

  AMexican activist leading a caravan of over 1,000 Central American migrants announced that his group expects to meet up with a caravan that's 10 times larger, Border Report writes. The two aim to converge and then proceed toward the U.S.-Mexico border. The organizer, Irineo Mujica, said that the caravans expect to meet in Veracruz on November 18. From there, they will head toward the Arizona-Mexico border. This deviates from the original plan to end this journey—which started near the border of Guatemala—in Mexico City. "We are not going to Mexico City, we are now going the northern border....

• 'Do It': Governor DeSantis Has a Plan for How He'll Retaliate Against Biden Sending Illegal Immigrants to Florida

  11/11/2021, 8:58:44 AM · by SeekAndFind · 46 replies

  Townhall ^ | 11/11/2021 | Leah Barkoukis

  All options are on the table for Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis as he attempts to fight back against the Biden administration secretly sending illegal immigrants to the Sunshine State. The Republican governor claimed the administration has sent 70 planes full of young illegal immigrants to Jacksonville in the middle of the night over the summer. Since the federal government controls the airspace, the flights have been “unannounced,” and DeSantis was given “no notice.” One option is going after the private contractors he believes the administration is working with. “We can obviously deny them state contracts, which we will do. Can...

• White House says DOJ will determine amount of payouts to migrant families

  11/9/2021, 5:17:22 AM · by MNDude · 64 replies

  NY Post ^

  senior White House adviser said the Justice Department will set the amount of compensation if it deems that paying migrants separated from their families will save taxpayers money — payments that run as much as $450,000 or more. “If the DOJ determines that it saves the taxpayers money and it rights a wrong, then they will make the determination that is necessary and I would assume if they make a determination, they’ll come up with what they think is an adequate dollar amount,” Cedric Richmond said on “Fox News Sunday.” Richmond said the Justice Department is making its decision independently...

--

 Taking the rights of the innocent  will never erase the harm done to the dead

Democrat Congresswoman Barbara Jordan: “Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave.”

BAD US Immigration policy is reason for NY Bomber

HEADLINE: Faisal Shahzad: Time Square Bomber, Islamic Terrorist (Shahzad Faisal)[Naturalized April 17th, 2009]
This entire mess rests on our screwy/PC immigration system. It is responsible, as well, for creating the problems in Arizona, as its citizens attempt to stem the invasion of the state by illegal aliens.
Latinos and Muslims get first crack at immigration, to appease them and their lobbying interests as 'legal entrants'. Third world immigrants are typically socialist/democrat voters.

A few years ago USCIS (agency in charge) lost 111,000 files they were to vet for 'legal residents' from foreign countries...so they just approved 30,000 instead, with no vetting.
Senator Charles Grassley commented at the time: "It only takes one missing file of somebody with links to a terrorist organization to become an American citizen," said Grassley, who is chairman of the Senate Finance Committee. "We can't afford to be handing out citizenship with blinders on."

Now remember, THIS is the agency who will vet the 20 million aliens that Obama and McCain want to put on a 'path to citizenship'. The agency is out of control!

Decent immigrants are put in the back of the line. They serve no purpose to push this country into socialism/anarchy.
People keep saying we allow 1 million Legal entries every year...WRONG. It’s closer to 4 million every year...and growing.

Take a look at just what USCIS does EVERY DAY. Last year we gave over a million citizenship, then there are the dozens of visas to suit just about anyone, including terrorists. And remember all those hunreds of thousands of refugees....Haitians, Somalians, etc. who get ‘temp legal status’...those are given out by the State Dept and not even counted in the USCIS numbers.

“A Day in the Life of USCIS”- (Is this any way to protect our nation?)

Some of the DAILY work of USCIS according to their own document:

* Conduct 135,000 national security background checks - IF they decide to!

* process 30,000 applications for immigrant benefits - PER DAY

* Issue 7,000 permanent resident cards (green cards -PER DAY)

* Welcome 2100 new citizens. PER DAY

* Welcome 3500 new permanent residents. PER DAY
_________________

DO NOT BELIEVE THESE RINOS WHEN THEY TELL YOU THEY'LL SECURE THE BORDER!

The Media picks our candidates!

Bill Clinton Finishes Third in Battle for Campaign Coverage
http://www.journalism.org/node/9512

Time they were given to speak in a recent debate:

Total Times:
Romney: 21:11, during 13 times
McCain: 16:00, during 13 times
Giuliani: 13:50, during 11 times
Huckabee: 12:11, during nine times
Paul: 6:31, during six times


In the "That's an understatement" category.....

John McCain, a few days ago...."I also spoke again yesterday to my friend Fred Thompson who assured me he is ready to do whatever it takes to help me win the election in November," McCain said. "I'm very proud to have the friendship and support of Fred Thompson as well."

Hillary Hopes You’ve Forgotten - Have You?

Hillary Clinton has been telling America that she is the most qualified candidate for president based on her “record,” which she says includes her eight years in the White House as First Lady - or “co-president” - and her seven years in the Senate. Here is a reminder of what that record includes:

HILLARY, As First Lady, assumed authority over Health Care Reform, a process that cost the taxpayers over $13 million. She told both Bill Bradley and Pat Moynahan, key votes were needed to pass her legislation, that she would “demonize “anyone who opposed it. But it was opposed; she couldn’t even get it to a vote in a Congress controlled by her own party. (And in the next election, her party lost control of both the House and Senate.)

HILLARY assumed authority over selecting a female Attorney General. Her first two recommendations (Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood) were forced to withdraw their names from consideration, and then she chose Janet Reno. Janet Reno has since been described by Bill himself as “my worst mistake.”

HILLARY recommended Lani Guanier for head of the Civil Rights Commission. When Guanier’s radical views became known, her name had to be withdrawn.

HILLARY recommended her former law partners, Web Hubbell, Vince Foster, and William Kennedy for positions in the Justice Department, White House staff, and the Treasury, respectively. Hubbell was later imprisoned, Foster committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.

HILLARY also recommended a close friend of the Clintons, Craig Livingstone, for the position of director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of up to 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, both Hillary and her husband denied knowing him. (FBI agent Dennis Sculimbrene confirmed in a Senate Judiciary Committee in 1996 both the drug use and Hillary’s involvement in hiring Livingstone. After that, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office, after serving seven presidents for over thirty years.)

HILLARY, in order to open “slots” in the White House for her friends the Harry Thomasons (to whom millions of dollars in travel contracts could be awarded), had the entire staff of the White House Travel Office fired. They were reported to the FBI for “gross mismanagement” and their reputations ruined. After a thirty-month investigation, only one, Billy Dale, was charged with a crime - mixing personal money with White House funds when he cashed checks. The jury acquitted him in less than two hours.

HILLARY also assumed the duty of directing the “bimbo eruption squad” and scandal defense:

...She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit.

...She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr’s investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs.

...Then they had to settle with Paula Jones after all.

...And Bill lost his law license for lying to the grand jury.

...And Bill was impeached by the House.

...And Hillary almost got herself indicted for perjury and obstruction of justice (she avoided it mostly because she repeated, “I do not recall,” “I have no recollection,” and “I don’t know” 56 times under oath).

HILLARY accepted the traditional First Lady’s role of decorator of the White House at Christmas, but in a unique Hillary way. In 1994, for example, The First Lady’s Tree in the Blue Room (the focal point each year) was Decorated with drug paraphernalia, sex toys, and pornographic ornaments, all personally approved by Hillary as the invited artists’ depictions of the theme, “The Twelve Days of Christmas.”

HILLARY wrote “It Takes a Village,” demonstrating her socialist viewpoint.

HILLARY decided to seek election to the Senate in a state she had never lived in. Her husband pardoned FALN terrorists in order to get Latino support and the New Square Hassidim to get Jewish support. Hillary also had Bill pardon her brother’s clients, for a small fee, to get financial support.

HILLARY then left the White House, but later had to return $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork she had stolen.

HILLARY played the “woman card” in the campaign for the Senate, by portraying her opponent (Lazio) as a bully picking on her
HILLARY’S husband further protected her by asking the National Archives to withhold from the public until 2012 many records of their time in the White House, including much of Hillary’s correspondence and her calendars. (There are ongoing lawsuits to force the release of those records.)

HILLARY, as the junior Senator from New York , passed no major legislation. She has deferred to the senior Senator (Schumer) to tend to the needs of New Yorkers, even on the hot issue of medical problems of workers involved in the cleanup of Ground Zero after 9/11.

Quite a resume, isn’t it?