If you only hear one voice on immigration...it should be DEMOCRAT Congresswoman BARBARA JORDAN

FINALLY! Someone besides TheTownCrier wrote an article about the wonderful Barbara Jordan!
"“Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave.”

 The Ghost of Barbara Jordan

Texas's first black congresswoman provided a voice missing from today's immigration debate.

By W. James Antle III • May 8, 2013  The American Conservative

 

How different would the immigration debate look today had Barbara Jordan lived? It’s a question frequently pondered by those of us who believe the answer to every problem concerning immigration isn’t necessarily more immigration.
Jordan was the first woman elected to Congress from Texas and the first Southern black female ever elected to the House. She compiled a similar record of firsts in Texas state politics and was active in the civil rights movement. But Jordan capped her career chairing the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform.
The commission’s vision of immigration reform was very different than the “comprehensive” variety pushed by a bipartisan gaggle of senators. To understand how different, consider Jordan’s contention in early 1995 congressional testimony that “deportation is crucial.”
“Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave,” Jordan said. “The top priorities for detention and removal, of course, are criminal aliens. But for the system to be credible, people actually have to be deported at the end of the process.”
Today’s comprehensive immigration reformers think it is an abomination to deport anyone but criminal aliens. The Obama administration has celebrated such deportations while announcing that most of the remaining illegal immigrant population isn’t an enforcement priority.
In all, the Jordan Commission favored reducing legal immigration by one-third, moving towards more skill-based immigration and away from chain migration, and enhanced enforcement. One need not support all its recommendations—I oppose national ID cards, for instance—to see that serious alternatives to the Gang of Eight approach were once seriously contemplated by such mainstream Democrats as former President Bill Clinton.
Not long after Jordan’s untimely death in January 1996, the effects of her absence were felt. Liberals could not say no to immigration, whatever its impact on the working poor. Economic conservatives decided her commission’s worksite enforcement mechanisms were insufficiently pro-business; Beltway social conservatives regarded its changes to family reunification as insufficiently pro-family.
Since then, the country has been plagued by the notion that racism is the only possible motivation for reducing immigration or enforcing immigration laws. There were once courageous liberals like Jordan and to a lesser extent Theodore Hesburgh to whom it was impossible to ascribe such motives who were willing to argue otherwise.
Jordan observed that “it is both a right and a responsibility of a democratic society to manage immigration so that it serves the national interest,” which includes the interests of citizens of every race, and naturalized citizens as well as natives and the “nativists” supposedly advocating on their behalf. [snip]

BACKTRACK:  http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/search?q=Barbara+Jordan

OMG! The Sky is Falling! The "Henny-Penny Party"

No kidding! It's gotten that childish with the whining and fear mongering from the democrats and their henchmen.   It's become the piss and moan du jour!  

To hear the left and their media tell it, since Trump supporters got their way ONE DAMN TIME…… Russians have all but taken over the government, slavery is back, all men are monsters (especially you white, Christians) who are going to gang rape all of us, cops are killing all the black people, we are oppressing all minorities and painting transvestites with a big red A…. and we ALL keep little Mexican babies in cages on the border! 

You spoiled little brats with your mob mentality. You are too stupid to know who your own enemies are.   You just play follow the leader, no matter HOW WRONG THEY ARE!

 Sorry!  Yes, some of us have just had it.  We overlooked your ignorance of history and current affairs, your arrogance, your lies and distortions, even your violence.  But we just can't wade through your childish fear mongering, gang mentality BULL SHIT any longer.

You OWN higher education. ALL of it, save a handful of private colleges struggling to survive with NO government help.  You have grade school students out protesting the bill of rights!! DUH!!

You OWN the media!   Oh, SHUT UP!  You know it, NO ONE IS THAT DUMB!

You own the judiciary and every rotten, self serving SOB LAWYER in government positions who SHOULDN'T BE there! They do enough damage in the judicial branch, no more of them can be tolerated in the other two branches ! That's why they hate Donald Trump SO BADLY! He isn't one of them, and WHATEVER else he is, THANK GOD for that!

You own all the non profits except the NRA!  Your kind don't PAY TAXES!

YOU have had the halls of power more often and started more wars than republicans ever did…. and REPUBLICANS SUCK!   Give someone else a chance…WE MATTER TOO! OUR lives MATTER TOO.  We haven't had representation in this country in MY LIFETIME since JFK!  IT's OUR TURN. VOTE US OUT like we did you! YOU ARE NOT the majority! This isn't a mob rule 'democracy', you usefull idiots!  Stop being used by powers you don't even understand!
YOU have lost NOTHING! ALL any of you have done since Trump has been in is to GAIN!
NONE of you can name one real threat! READ HIS WORDS! Stop being used by the media, it's disgusting to watch you parrot their lies!

 

Thanks Mike Rilling,  for this disgusting display in our Capitol today!   And they DARE complain about Trump being 'unpolished'.....BLOOD IS A WEAPON!

 Stop behaving like 3rd world anarchists and CHILDREN!
 Damn!


You Henny Pennies need to SHUT UP!  Get over yourselves, get a job and LEAVE US ALONE!   We can't afford you and your leaders any more.
TTC
____________________________

AN ARTICLE WE MISSED -  WORTH REPEATING!

Barbara Jordan's wisdom is needed in today's immigration debate

  01/17/18 06:50 AM EST  The Hill

The Trump administration declared today to be Barbara Jordan Day, the 22nd anniversary of the legendary former Texas congresswoman’s passing. Presidents often make such declarations to honor heroes from our country’s past. However, Jordan was no relic from a bygone era. She was a trailblazer on many issues, not the least of which was immigration policy. Our country would greatly benefit if more of the players in the current immigration debate shared her vision.
Jordan was an icon and a pioneer, but didn’t fit into the neat categories of the modern political landscape. She is primarily known for a series of firsts: First African-American elected to the Texas Senate after Reconstruction, first Southern African-American woman elected to the U.S. House of Representatives, and the first African-American woman to deliver the keynote address at the Democratic National Convention. She also gave a memorable opening statement at the House Judiciary Committee hearings during impeachment proceedings against Richard Nixon.
With that resume, and by today’s politics, one would assume Jordan would be an open borders advocate who endorsed all the Democratic Party’s platform positions on border security, sanctuary cities, chain migration and the visa lottery. That assumption would be wrong. Jordan was a staunch proponent of an America-first immigration policy that sought to have new arrivals be a benefit, not a burden, to the country.
Though a lifelong, loyal Democrat, Jordan staked out positions on immigration that would today make her a pariah in her party. As the chair of the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform from 1994-1996, Jordan advocated for increased restriction of immigration, and increased penalties on employers who violated immigration rules. Her rhetoric was ahead of its time considering the pro-enforcement sentiment that swept Donald Trump into the White House in 2016.

Under her leadership, the commission conducted a sweeping, bipartisan review of U.S. immigration policy. In that report, informally known as the Jordan Commission, she debunked concepts of illegal immigration that have found support today.
“For immigration to continue to serve our national interest, it must be lawful,” she wrote. “There are people who argue that some illegal aliens contribute to our community because they may work, pay taxes, send their children to our schools, and in all respects except one, obey the law. Let me be clear: that is not enough.”
As Republicans and Democrats wrangle over the future of immigration policy, some Jordanian common sense should be applied. Namely, we need to ask those opposed to reform why they do not support policies that would protect American lives, prosper Americans, and improve the upward mobility of legal immigrants and the vulnerable. Should the priority of our elected leaders be to improve the lives of American citizens, or allow corrupt regimes to export their poverty problem to us?

 

If a program has to ignore laws to work - it's a program that's not meant to work.

And 

Where is your intellectual curiosity about immigration? 

The Center for Immigration Studies has a great article today titled, "A Blueprint for Immigration Reform"about the one and only Congresswoman Barbara Jordan and the commission she headed to study immigration policy in the '90's, who we have written about before.

We haven't seen a common sense statesman from the left like this outstanding democrat legislator in decades.    Do yourself a favor one day, find a video of Jordan and listen to her speak.  She was amazing.

The CIS article tells us, "It was generally known as the Jordan Commission, named for the late Barbara Jordan, the powerful woman who served the longest period as the Commission's chairwoman. The Jordan Commission, unlike the current White House, took its time to do its work, and decided, unanimously, that there was no need for an alien legalization program. Its work was summed up in these words:

The credibility of immigration policy can be measured by a simple yardstick: people who should get in, do get in; people who should not get in are kept out; and people who are judged deportable are required to leave.^2"

 AH.............HOW simple and SWEET it is!   THAT's a lost art in politics today!  And THAT is also the LAW!

More: 

The detailed and thoughtful recommendations in the Commission's 1997 final report,³ called for the nation to:

• Integrate the immigrants now in the United States more thoroughly;
• Reduce the total number of legal immigrants to about 550,000 a year;
• Rationalize the nonimmigrant visa programs and regulate them;
• Enforce the immigration law vigorously with no further amnesties; and
• Re-organize the management of the immigration processes within the government.

 Now, don't fool yourself for a moment, Jordan wasn't and isn't the only democrat/progressive who thought the way she and her commission did.  Today we have  Progressives for Immigration Reform with their platform:


Refor

1. Reduce annual immigration into the United States from its current
   1.2 million to between 300,000 and 550,000 people.
2. Rework trade and foreign aid policies to improve conditions for people
   in our major immigration sender countries.
3. Mandate the use of E-verify for all new hires and enforce serious penalties
   on employers who hire workers illegally.
4. Avoid any expansion of "guest worker" programs.

 It appears that not only do hacks like John McCain fail to listen to the people who put him in office, but the democrats like Obama don't listen to their constituents either.  But then, Obama doesn't need you liberals or Black Americans any more, does he?  He's got a NEW constituency who likes his socialist, anti-American agenda.

A recent survey sums up the real problem with one question:

When asked why there is a large illegal population in the country, voters overwhelming (71 percent) thought it was because we had not made a real effort to enforce our immigration laws. Only 18 percent said it was because we were not letting in enough immigrants legally.

If a program has to ignore laws to work - it is a program that is not meant to work.

And Just BECAUSE I LIKE IT! 

 

 

Wisdom in History ---Immigration --Barbara Jordan

Barbara Jordan was an eloquent, outspoken legislator, and it's a shame congress did NOT take her recommendations.

Testimony of Barbara Jordan
Chair, U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform
Before the U.S. House of Representatives
Committee on Appropriations
Subcommittee on Appropriations for the Departments of
Commerce, Justice, State, the Judiciary and Related Agencies
March 29, 1995

Mr. Chairman, members of the subcommittee, thank you for providing this opportunity to testify today. I am Barbara Jordan, the Chair of the Commission on Immigration Reform.
(snip)
The Commission on Immigration Reform was created by the Immigration Act of 1990. We are a fully bipartisan body. In addition to the Chair, we have eight members who were appointed by the majority and minority leadership in each house of Congress.

The Commission's 1994 report to Congress was entitled U.S. Immigration Policy: Restoring Credibility. The title is telling of our recommendations. The Commission believes it is essential to control illegal immigration if we are to have a credible immigration policy. We believe legal immigration is in the national interest, but see illegal immigration as a threat both to our long tradition of immigration and to our commitment to the rule of law.

The Commission recommends a comprehensive, seven-point strategy to restore credibility. Let me tell you that the strategy is neither cheap nor painless. There are no quick fixes to our immigration problems; there are no inexpensive solutions. For too long we have neglected immigration as a public policy issue and now must pay for the consequences.

Four points in our report call for special attention. First, we need improved border management. The Commission calls for a strategy of prevention of illegal entry and facilitation of legal ones in the national interest. The concept is simpler, of course, than its achievement. The Commission was highly impressed with the border operations in El Paso that aim to prevent illegal entry. It is far better to deter illegal immigration than to play the cat and mouse game that results from apprehensions followed by return followed by re-entry. To accomplish a true deterrence strategy will require additional personnel as well as a strategic use of technology and equipment. We will also require new measures of effectiveness because apprehensions alone cannot measure success in preventing illegal entries. Our goal should be zero apprehensions-not because aliens get past the Border Patrol but because they are prevented entry in the first place.

While we tighten our control over illegal entry, we must also reduce the long waiting times at our ports of entry. It is ridiculous that people with legitimate border crossing cards feel it is more convenient to cross illegally than go through our ports of entry. But that is the case. Our own delegation waited for one and one-half hours to cross from Juarez into El Paso-and this wasn't even at rush hour. In an age of NAFTA, we must do a better job of handling the legitimate border travel. The Commission supports the development of a land border user fee whose resources would be used to open more lanes, add more inspectors and, if necessary, more ports of entry to speed this traffic.

Our second set of recommendations would reduce the magnet that jobs currently present for illegal immigration. We have concluded that illegal immigrants come primarily for employment. The Commission believes that we need to enhance our enforcement of both employer sanctions and labor standards. But, to make employer sanctions work, we must improve the means by which employers verify the work authorization of new employees. The Commission believes the most promising option is a computerized system for determining if a social security number is valid and has been issued to someone authorized to work in the United States. We are pleased that the Administration has endorsed our recommendations in this area, and we look forward to working with INS and the Social Security Administration on the design of pilot programs that will phase in and test this new verification approach. I urge this committee to provide the funding needed to develop the computerized system and implement the pilot programs.

Third, the Commission urges greater consistency in our immigration and benefits policies. We believe that illegal aliens should be eligible for no public benefits other than those of an emergency nature, in the public health and safety interest, and constitutionally protected. On the other hand, we urge the Congress to retain for legal immigrants eligibility for our safety net programs. The United States screens legal immigrants to determine if they will become public charges, but unforeseen circumstances-deaths, illnesses-occur. The Commission does not want to see individuals whom we have invited to enter become vulnerable when such situations arise. On the other hand, the Commission strongly supports efforts to make our public charge provisions work. We do not want the U.S. taxpayer to bear a burden when there is a sponsor in this country who has pledged to provide support for an immigrant. The affidavits of support signed by sponsors should be legally binding, and the provisions for deportation of those who do become a public charge-for reasons known prior to entry-should be strengthened.

The Commission also made recommendations regarding impact aid for states and localities experiencing the fiscal effects of illegal immigration. We believe the federal government has a responsibility in this area. The first responsibility is to control illegal entries; the second is to help states and localities with their fiscal problems. However, we are skeptical of some of the data used to calculate these fiscal impacts. At present, the Commission believes that the data to support reimbursement of criminal justice costs are sound and we urge immediate reimbursement of these costs. We are not prepared to make such a recommendation regarding medical and education costs. We also urge that any impact aid provided require appropriate cooperation by states and localities in the enforcement of immigration policy.

Our fourth area concerns the removal of criminal aliens. The Commission supports enhancement of the Institutional Hearing Program that permits the federal government to obtain a deportation order while criminal aliens are still serving their sentences. Once the sentence is over, it is far easier and less expensive to remove the alien after an IHP proceeding. The Commission also recommends further negotiation of bilateral treaties that will permit deportation of criminal aliens to serve their sentences in their home countries.

We are also looking at naturalization and the civic integration of newcomers to the United States. I, for one, would like to see all eligible immigrants become U.S. citizens-and become citizens for the right reasons, not to receive some federal benefit but to be fully participating members of our polity. Right now, there are too many barriers to naturalization. In some districts, it can take two years to complete the process. We plan to have recommendations to improve this situation.

http://www.utexas.edu/lbj/uscir/032995.html

The Reign of the 'Pussies' is OVER!

THANK you, NEW HAMPSHIRE!

Cruzers kept telling me last week that Trump did NOT get the vote 75% of Iowans....well guess what...Cruz did NOT get 89% of New Hampshire voters!
DUH.
Look, Folks, why not pick a winner instead of the guy you think will represent your churchiness?   It's the only logical reason to vote for Cruz and represents THE problem.....identity voting...a black guy for the blacks, a Hispanic for the illegal aliens, and Hillary just because she says she's a woman??

Donald Trump has PROVEN his leadership skills and his ability to wisely use money by running the MOST successful presidential campaign ever on a shoestring budget.....his FIRST political campaign.  If you don't have the intellectual curiosity to want to see what he can do for this nation, you're just not playing with an open mind.  

 Ted sure seems to forget things!   

Ted Cruz Failed To Disclose Ties To Caribbean Holding Company

An old college friendship led to financial entanglement with a Jamaican private equity firm and a British Virgin Islands holding company. Neither was disclosed during his 2012 campaign. 

http://swampland.time.com/2013/10/18/ted-cruz-failed-to-disclose-ties-to-jamaican-holding-company/

As for John Kasich, who came in 2nd.........owned by Lehman Bros who he represented for 10 years and started the big $$$ bail out mess.   He ought to be in Jail like the Goldman Sachs criminals.  John is the ESTABLISHMENT/GLOBAL candidate.

John Kasich's Wall Street ties could haunt 2016 bid ...

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/08/politics/john-kasich-2016-lehman-brothers-wall-street/

CNN

Jun 8, 2015 - Kasich joined Lehman's investment banking division as managing director

You should have seen the lefty Joe Cline on PBS last night...Charlie Rose show.  He was coming undone over Trump winning and insulted Trump supporters as being the dumbest, most dangerous people on earth.  Even another panelist set him straight that Trump is attracting all demographics and 'intelligence' and that voters are making the decision to kick the BUMS out!


BTW.....Did anyone catch the great ad during the democrat debate a few weeks ago featuring Barbara Jordan
and illegal immigration by Numbers USA? https://www.numbersusa.com/blog/our-barbara-jordan-ad-debates-stunned-shocked-angered-buoyed-viewers-why-barbara

Thousands* of needy, criminal aliens coming to YOUR HOMETOWN!! Biden is importing death.

Many of these pictures and video of the thousands and thousands of illegal alien young men are from USA Today.  This is a small sample of what is heading our way now that Biden has removed all restrictions meant for keeping them out.

NOT seeing a single American Flag!!!  They don't want to be Americans!  They bring their 'world' to us!

The Mayor of New York is providing luxury hotels for the invaders at taxpayer's expense while thousands of US citizens, many who are elderly, on the west coast search for homes after being burned out from wildfires for the last 3 or 4 years!

*BTW... that's thousands... EVERY DAY!

Pay attention to the majority of MEN between the ages of 15 and 35.  THAT is an ARMY!!

This is Guatemala trying to control a caravan heading for the USA.

Coverage of these never-ending caravans of traffic human beings is difficult because NO reporters will go to Mexico or points south. The UN recently declared the Mexican border the MOST dangerous land crossing on EARTH!!! More kidnappings and journalists killed in Mexico than ANYWHERE.  We are importing DEATH.

See:  

UN migration study deems US-Mexico border 'deadliest' land route in the world based on 2021

A new study has labeled the border crossing between the U.S. and Mexico the deadliest migration land route in the world. 

The study, conducted by the Missing Migrants Project and published by the International Organization for Migration (IOM), recorded at least 1,238 deaths during migration in the Americas in 2021, with at least 728 of those deaths occurring on the U.S-Mexico border. 

"The number of deaths on the United States-Mexico border last year is significantly higher than in any year prior, even before COVID-19," Edwin Viales, author of the report, said. "Yet, this number remains an undercount due to the diverse challenges for data collection."

So far in 2022, 13 journalists have been murdered in Mexico in possible relation to their work.

The most recent case is that of Ernesto Méndez, director of the news site Tu Voz, who was shot to death in San Luis de La Paz, in the central state of Guanajuato. According to local journalism advocacy group Article 19, he was shot and killed inside a bar owned by his family.

While the victims’ families, Mexican journalists and journalism organizations continue to seek justice in each of these cases, the Mexican government only considers 11 of them to have been motivated by their work as journalists.

More: Why murdered journalists in Mexico should worry us in Arizona

Violence in Tijuana continues amid shelter-in-place warning

https://www.borderreport.com/immigration/border-crime/violence-in-tijuana-continues-amid-shelter-in-place-warning/

Aug 14, 2022 

MAYBE the few good Federal agents will speak!  

Jim Jordan says 14 FBI whistleblowers have come forward

8/16/2022, 4:44:55 AM · 

Washington Examiner ^ | 8-15-22

(Excerpt) During a conversation about alleged politicization at the Justice Department, along with former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, Jordan made the case that the U.S. public has "figured it out" when it comes to the Left generating a lie, "Big Media" reports the lie, Big Tech amplifies the lie, and then they pile on Republicans when they catch on and say something. He said there are agents in the bureau who have realized the same. "Fourteen FBI agents have come to our office as whistleblowers, and they are good people," Jordan said. 

These pictures are a drop in the bucket and Biden has opened the last gate Trump put up to protect us.

• Biden administration says ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy is over

  Associated Press ^ | August 9, 2022

  The Department of Homeland Security said Monday that it ended a Trump-era policy requiring asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico for hearings in U.S. immigration court, hours after a judge lifted an order in effect since December that it be reinstated. The timing had been in doubt since the Supreme Court ruled on June 30 that the Biden administration could end the “Remain in Mexico” policy. Homeland Security officials had been largely silent, saying they had to wait for the court to certify the ruling and for a Trump-appointed judge, Matthew Kacsmaryk in Amarillo, Texas, to then lift his injunction. The...

Democrat Congresswoman Barbara Jordan: “Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave.”

Elon Musk tweets about the illegal alien invasion: "THIS IS A MAJOR CRISIS!'

Early this morning, Musk tweeted a reply to Cong. Jim Jordan's tweet:

Rep. Jim Jordan

@Jim_Jordan

·

Feb 15

Every local official. Every border patrol agent. Every business owner. Rancher. Sheriff. They all tell us they’ve never seen a border crisis this bad.

And Joe Biden continues to do nothing.

5:52 PM · Feb 15, 2023·

2M

Views

Elon Musk

@elonmusk

·

13h

Replying to

@Jim_Jordan

This is a major crisis

(and included this photo below)

nypost.com

Mayor Adams blasts 'far left' for 'doing nothing' on border crisis:...

Mayor Eric Adams blasted the "far left" on Monday for its inaction and "silence" regarding the devastating impact of the US border crisis o

.

3:03 AM · Feb 17, 2023

Rep. Jim Jordan on Twitter: "Every local official. Every border patrol agent. Every business owner. Rancher. Sheriff. They all tell us they’ve never seen a border crisis this bad. And Joe Biden continues to do nothing." / Twitter

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

From our friend Larry Elder.... The truth!!   We can't help the Black Community until we get honest.

IT IS WHite people targeted for Ethnic cleansing!

LOOK at BIDEN's DOJ figures!!!

As to white-black homicides, there about 750 per year.

500 whites are killed by blacks;

250 blacks are killed by whites.

As to white-black non-homicide violent crime— attempted murder, manslaughter, rape, aggravated assault, roughly 500K per year. 85% are black perp/white victim.

Larry Elder

@larryelder

·

8h

As to white-black homicides, there about 750 per year. 500 whites are killed by blacks; 250 blacks are killed by whites. As to white-black non-homicide violent crime— attempted murder, manslaughter, rape, aggravated assault, roughly 500K per year. 85% are black perp/white victim.

Illegal Immigrants and Crime

Share

By PETER KIRSANOW

February 8, 2018 1:23 AM

Illegal Immigrant Crime Rates | National Review

‐ Illegal-immigrant crime calculations conveniently and invariably steal a base by leaving out the millions of crimes committed by illegal immigrants related to procuring fraudulent social security numbers, obtaining false drivers’ licenses, using fraudulent green cards, and improperly accessing public benefits.

‐ My SCAAP-extrapolated crime figures actually are lower than those calculated by John Lott. Using Arizona Department of Corrections data spanning 1985–2017, Lott calculates that illegal immigrants in Arizona aged 18-35, for example, are 250 percent more likely to commit crimes than young U.S. citizens. Further, such illegal immigrants commit more serious crimes — such as murder, robbery, and sexual assault.

‐ Illegal-immigrant crime data, regardless of source, likely understate crimes committed by illegal aliens. That’s because illegal-immigrant victims are less likely to report crime, and even if crimes are reported, illegal immigrants are less likely to appear as witnesses leading to conviction.

‐ Even if illegal immigrants didn’t commit crimes at a higher rate than U.S. citizens, they nonetheless commit crimes — each one of which is a crime that shouldn’t have been committed in the U.S.

‐ It’s peculiar that government agencies, notorious for aggregating the most obscure statistics imaginable, do not tabulate crime data for illegal aliens. Why do you think that’s the case?

Democrat Congresswoman Barbara Jordan: “Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave.”