Leftists use gas for stock car races. Hypocrites! Go electric! Walk your talk! Stop racing!!

I know of a bunch of lefties who push the entire green bull shit agenda on all of us while they burn petroleum every weekend and never bat an eye and vote for criminals like Biden and Harris.  Every false accusation they made against Trump has been committed by those two.  

One of those racing fans is a lesbian who hates men, oil companies and the constitution.  She sponsors these drivers. Another such supporter in the same small No. California community is a Transexual loving preacher.  We discussed this before here:TheTownCrier: Socialist "Christians" are destroying Church and Nation - The Church of Perpetual Victimhood (towncriernews.blogspot.com)

Both are intolerant against traditional Christianity, anyone conservative, so they hijack it and spread the hypocrisy of their twisted socialist, social engineering mentally ill brains.  

So, burn that fuel as you drive in circles like any monkey could, as you so proudly destroy this nation. 

PSSST!!!

Last night Bill O'reilly pointed out that Biden's lies about inflation being Putin's fault....

When Trump left the inflation rate was 1.7%.

In February, 2022 BEFORE Putin invaded Ukraine, the index was 8%!

YOU must be the media!!!!

-------------

The other "media" outlets have reporters on the balcony of their hotel where they stay in the basement except for 5 minutes to report what the Biden administration tells them to report.

These are my favorites, as well as a beautiful Australian lady working for Newsmax.  The other male reporter, Chuck Holton, was special forces trained and saves lives. He carried one man out on his back.  He is spectacular. REAL reporting!

They have done amazing reporting

You can get a free app or find Newsmax on Roku.

Glamorous Aussie journalist Sarah Williamson stuns American viewers while broadcasting from Ukraine for conservative network Newsmax: 'The sexiest reporter on TV!'

Democrat Congresswoman Barbara Jordan: “Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave.”

Jefferson is not just a state of mind, our futures depend on its reality

Aug 20, 2013

Mark Baird, State of Jefferson

http://pienpolitics.com/?p=17680 

There are many misconceptions regarding a State of Jefferson.  The State of Jefferson has nothing to do with secession.  The idea of forming a new state from the land within another state, not only has legal standing under Article 4 Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution.   There is historical precedence.  Four times in the history of our country new states have been formed from other states.  No one is suggesting nor do we support secession.  It would not work.

Those who suggest that the formation of a new state would not improve the declining economy of Rural Counties in California are sadly mistaken.

Our goal with our new state, Jefferson, is to “Start Over”.  We could return to basic, common sense, government.  We could have a favorable corporate tax rate.  We could have a favorable business climate.  California has been ranked the worst state in which to do business.  Businesses now flocking to other states with reckless abandon, would have a much closer alternative.  Primarily Urban representatives with little regard for rural California pass taxes which their constituents do not pay, and allow agencies to increase fees, their constituents are not subject to.  All of this could change in our new State of Jefferson. Do the rural counties of California really need over 5700 state agencies?  I think we could dispense with several thousand of them in our new state and no one would notice a decline in service.  State agencies consistently fail to defend themselves in the process known as “sue and settle” with environmental NGOs.  Our new state could make “sue and settle” a crime by government code.  Malfeasance should be a crime, but California views this practice as a way to gain fees and the power of the permit.  This power is used to regulate every aspect of our lives.  We could institute state codes which stipulate that environmental law suits must prove specific harm.  These suits were used in “sue and settle” actions which have stopped mining, logging and are now aimed at farming.

Does rural California need a bullet train at the cost of 80 Billion dollars?  Does rural California really need to be on the hook for our share of another 50-80 Billion to dig two tunnels under the delta in order to help southern California water exporters take north state water even faster than they do now?

A State of Jefferson would flourish economically under common sense basic government aimed to protect the rights of the people and allow responsible development of our abundant natural resources.

Small business would flourish without the morass of regulation, permits and fees which we now must navigate.

This is not a partisan issue.  The State of Jefferson must include both conservative and liberal viewpoints.  Exclusion will not work just as secession will not work.  We must learn to work together, to the highest degree this is possible, to make our way forward.  We must work together to make a place where our children can get jobs and have decent lives.  I, for one, am tired of our absolute lack of representation in Sacramento.  I,  am tired of watching all of the young people leave the north state because there is no future for them here.  I would be willing to live with a few pot holes in order to live in a free state, secure in the knowledge that a state which respects the rights of the people flew its double cross flag over our new Capital.  Join us,  petition your Board of Supervisors.

Lets “Start Over”.  Lets go back to basics in our own State of Jefferson.

Mark Baird,

Jefferson Declaration Committee

________________________________________________________________

 

Pictures worth a thousand words!

 Texas Bluebells, Y'all!

Good Grief… Now Team Obama Wants to Blow Up 3 Dams In the Name of Junk Science

We are posting this article from Gateway Pundit in it's entirety. THIS is important, and not just because I can see one of these dams from my deck. What will you do when they come after YOUR property!?? Why do they want to destroy the cleanest, cheapest fuel available??? We are already being billed monthly for this dam removal and it hasn't happened...yet! Please help us stop it.

Good Grief…
Now Team Obama Wants to Blow Up 3 Dams In the Name of Junk Science

Just when you thought things couldn’t get any weirder…
The Obama Administration now wants to demolish three dams in northern California to supposedly save the salmon… But the whole reason to support the move was based on shoddy and inconclusive scientific data.

Dam fish

Greenheads say the dams threaten salmon. They want the dams gone and Obama agrees.

Now a scientist is challenging the junk science behind the decision.
The City Square reported:

Against intense local opposition, the Obama administration wants to demolish three dams on the Klamath River in Siskiyou County, California. Low-cost clean hydroelectricity as well as water for irrigation would be lost if the dams were removed. Removal of the dams would also cause chaos for ranchers, homeowners, and small business who live and work in the downstream of the dams. Despite this, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has been trying to force dam removal for the supposed benefit of some salmon and steelhead spawning habitat.

Now, Prof. Paul R. Houser of George Mason University alleges that the administration’s plan is all based on junk science. In his role as science advisor to the Bureau of Reclamation, he was closely involved in the project. He has filed a formal complaint (PDF) alleging “intentional falsification” and “intentional . . . compromise of scientific and scholarly integrity.”

A dam in So. Oregon was recently removed...and NOW they can't deal with the sludge from it!

And HERE is a great, informed response by one of our county officials.